<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:base="https://maccafan.net/">
  <title>Maccafan</title>
  <subtitle>Paul McCartney news, archive, and analysis</subtitle>
  <link href="https://maccafan.net/news/feed.xml" rel="self"/>
  <link href="https://maccafan.net/news/"/><updated>2026-05-03T00:00:00.000Z</updated><id>https://maccafan.net/</id>
  <author>
    <name>Maccafan News</name>
    <email>editor@maccafan.net</email>
  </author><entry>
    <title>McCartney III turns five: how a pandemic side project became a late-career landmark</title>
    <link href="https://maccafan.net/news/2026/05/mccartney-iii-five-years/"/>
    <updated>2026-05-03T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <id>https://maccafan.net/news/2026/05/mccartney-iii-five-years/</id>
    <author>
      <name>Maccafan Editorial</name>
    </author>
    <summary>Five years after its surprise December 2020 release, McCartney III stands as one of Paul&#39;s most personal and quietly revolutionary records. A retrospective on its making, reception, and place in the trilogy.</summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In December 2020, with the world locked down and concert halls shuttered, Paul McCartney quietly released his eighteenth solo studio album. <em>McCartney III</em> arrived without the year-long marketing campaign typical of major artist releases. There was no tour, no late-night television appearance, no Glastonbury headline slot. There was just a record, recorded almost entirely alone in Sussex during the early months of the pandemic, and a generation of fans suddenly thrown into the strange position of receiving brand-new music from a Beatle in real time.</p>
<p>Five years on, <em>McCartney III</em> has settled into the catalog. It's worth asking how it sits there.</p>
<h2>The trilogy, completed</h2>
<p>Paul has made three solo albums titled simply for himself: <em>McCartney</em> in 1970, <em>McCartney II</em> in 1980, and <em>McCartney III</em> in 2020. Each was made largely alone, each appeared during a moment of creative or personal transition, and each was treated, on release, as something of a curiosity rather than a major statement.</p>
<p><em>McCartney</em> (1970) was famously the album that broke the Beatles, recorded in his home studio in the months following Linda's first pregnancy and the band's collapse. <em>McCartney II</em> (1980), made in the wake of the Wings tour cancellation and Paul's brief Japanese imprisonment, leaned heavily into early-eighties synth experimentation in a way that puzzled critics at the time but has since been reassessed as quietly prescient.</p>
<p><em>McCartney III</em> completes the loop, fifty years on from the first. The pattern is the same: a Beatle alone with his instruments, working without committee. The result, this time, is more reflective than experimental.</p>
<h2>Recording history</h2>
<p>By Paul's own account in the album's accompanying interviews, <em>McCartney III</em> began without an album in mind. He had been working on a film score that fell through when production halted in March 2020. Rather than abandon the recordings, he kept going. Songs accumulated. Eventually he had a record.</p>
<p>The album was tracked at Hog Hill Mill, his Sussex studio. With the exception of brass on one track and some additional vocals, Paul played every instrument himself.</p>
<h2>What the album sounds like</h2>
<p><em>McCartney III</em> is, by Paul's standards, a quiet record. There are flashes of his familiar pop instincts (<em>Find My Way</em> opens the album with a propulsive guitar line that wouldn't sound out of place on <em>Flaming Pie</em>), but the dominant mode is reflective. <em>Pretty Boys</em>, <em>Women and Wives</em>, and <em>Deep Deep Feeling</em> are all built around vocal performances that lean into Paul's age rather than away from it.</p>
<p>The most striking track, <em>Long Tailed Winter Bird</em>, opens the album with seven minutes of acoustic guitar and percussive vocalization, instrumental except for some wordless vocal tracking late in the song. It's the kind of opening that announces a record is going to take its time.</p>
<h2>Critical reception</h2>
<p>The album was generally well-received on release, with critics noting its intimacy and Paul's evident comfort with solo recording. <em>Rolling Stone</em> gave it a four-star review. <em>MOJO</em> placed it in its top albums of 2020. <em>Pitchfork</em> gave it a 7.1, which for Paul represents a very respectable score from a publication that has historically been cool to Beatles solo work.</p>
<p>Five years on, the consensus seems to be that <em>McCartney III</em> is the best of the three trilogy entries. It lacks the historical weight of the 1970 album (which arrived with the Beatles' breakup as its subtext) and the bracing weirdness of the 1980 record, but it has something the other two don't: an artist comfortable in his own skin, making music for its own sake.</p>
<h2>Place in the catalog</h2>
<p>Where does <em>McCartney III</em> sit in the broader McCartney solo discography? It's not at the top: <em>Band on the Run</em>, <em>Ram</em>, <em>Tug of War</em>, and <em>Flaming Pie</em> still occupy that ground. But it's better than its quiet release would suggest, and it's holding up as well as any record Paul has made since <em>Chaos and Creation in the Backyard</em> (2005).</p>
<p>For an artist who has been releasing music continuously for sixty-three years, the achievement of <em>McCartney III</em> is not that it's a comeback (Paul never went anywhere) or a reinvention (he doesn't reinvent). The achievement is that, at seventy-eight, alone in a studio, with no commercial expectation hanging over the project, he made a record that is recognizably and unmistakably his own.</p>
<p>That's harder than it sounds.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry><entry>
    <title>Why Ram is the most modern record Paul McCartney ever made</title>
    <link href="https://maccafan.net/news/2026/05/ram-retrospective/"/>
    <updated>2026-05-01T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <id>https://maccafan.net/news/2026/05/ram-retrospective/</id>
    <author>
      <name>Maccafan Editorial</name>
    </author>
    <summary>Half a century after critics savaged it, Paul and Linda McCartney&#39;s Ram has been reclaimed as one of the most influential records of the early 1970s. A retrospective on its making, its critics, and its long second life.</summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In May 1971, Paul and Linda McCartney released an album that critics buried on arrival. Jon Landau, writing in <em>Rolling Stone</em>, called it &quot;the nadir in the decomposition of Sixties rock thus far.&quot; Robert Christgau gave it a C. The general mood, in a year already crowded with John Lennon's <em>Imagine</em> and George Harrison's <em>All Things Must Pass</em>, was that the lightest Beatle had finally proven himself a lightweight.</p>
<p>Half a century later, <em>Ram</em> is one of the most influential records of its decade. It has been covered in its entirety by multiple artists. Its songs turn up in younger musicians' record collections with the regularity of a foundational text. <em>Pitchfork</em>, reviewing the 2012 reissue, gave it a perfect score. Indie pop, as a sound, sometimes seems to be reverse-engineered from this single album.</p>
<p>How a record gets from &quot;nadir&quot; to &quot;foundational text&quot; is a story worth telling.</p>
<h2>The making of an outlier</h2>
<p>After his 1970 debut <em>McCartney</em>, an album recorded almost entirely alone at home in the months following the Beatles' collapse, Paul wanted something more polished. He and Linda flew to New York in October 1970 to begin work on the follow-up, holding auditions for musicians in a 45th Street attic and a Bronx basement. Some auditioning players were brought in under the guise of recording a commercial jingle, the McCartneys keeping the real project quiet. Guitarist David Spinozza was recruited first, with drummer Denny Seiwell, soon to be a founding member of Wings, brought in shortly after.</p>
<p>Basic tracks were taped at Columbia's Studio B between October and November 1970, with additional sessions at Studio D, A&amp;R Recording Studios, and finally Sunset Sound Recorders in Los Angeles, where Norwegian engineer Eirik Wangberg took over mixing duties from producer Jim Guercio and finished the album over six weeks. Paul gave Wangberg unusually free rein. Among Wangberg's decisions: stitching two unfinished songs together to create <em>Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey</em>, and adding the artificial-stereo thunder effects that open its second half.</p>
<p>The album was credited to Paul <em>and Linda</em> McCartney, the only studio album to bear that joint billing. Linda's vocal contributions were primarily harmonies, but her presence on the credits was, at the time, controversial. Paul has since acknowledged that the joint credit had practical implications around publishing royalties; it was also, plainly, a statement.</p>
<h2>Why critics hated it</h2>
<p>The hostility <em>Ram</em> received in 1971 makes more sense in context than it does in retrospect. The Beatles had broken up the previous year, and the rock press of 1971 was actively choosing sides. John Lennon was making confrontational, politically engaged solo records. George Harrison had delivered a triple-album spiritual epic. Paul, by contrast, made a record about his wife, his farm, and his sheep.</p>
<p>Lennon himself heard slights in it. <em>Too Many People</em> opens with the line &quot;too many people preaching practices,&quot; which Lennon took as a direct attack and answered the following year with <em>How Do You Sleep?</em> on <em>Imagine</em>. The opening words of <em>Ram</em>, when reversed, are reportedly a half-audible &quot;piss off.&quot; For listeners hoping to find the next Beatles record in this sleeve, what they got instead was domestic, eccentric, and almost willfully unfashionable.</p>
<p>Christgau called it &quot;the most stupid mainstream rock record of the past few years.&quot; Landau's <em>Rolling Stone</em> review went further, accusing Paul of having needed Lennon's editorial discipline to produce anything of value. The consensus formed quickly: <em>Ram</em> was the sound of a major artist losing the plot.</p>
<h2>Why it mattered anyway</h2>
<p>Several things were happening in <em>Ram</em> that took the rock press a generation to catch up to.</p>
<p>The first is its compositional restlessness. Songs like <em>Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey</em> and <em>The Back Seat of My Car</em> are essentially mini-suites, structurally closer to the <em>Abbey Road</em> medley than to anything on Lennon's <em>Plastic Ono Band</em>. <em>Monkberry Moon Delight</em>, which Paul's adopted daughter Heather sings backing vocals on, is a piece of vocal-led baroque pop that has been covered by everyone from Screamin' Jay Hawkins to Phish.</p>
<p>The second is its texture. The combination of Spinozza and Hugh McCracken's interlocking acoustic guitars, Seiwell's loose, jazz-inflected drumming, and Linda's high harmonies created a sound that was simultaneously homemade and elaborately produced. This combination of &quot;sounds like it was made on a farm&quot; with &quot;actually has George Martin string arrangements on three tracks&quot; is exactly the formula that two generations of indie-pop artists have spent years trying to reverse-engineer.</p>
<p>The third is its emotional ambiguity. <em>Ram</em> refuses to commit to either the rural-domestic warmth its cover promises or the embattled-defensive posture its opening lines establish. The result is a record that feels strange and unresolved in ways that more straightforwardly autobiographical singer-songwriter albums of the era do not.</p>
<h2>The long second life</h2>
<p>The first signs of critical reappraisal came in the late 1990s, when artists like Jon Brion and the High Llamas began citing <em>Ram</em> as a touchstone. The Brion connection mattered: he produced records for Aimee Mann, Fiona Apple, and Kanye West, and the Ram-derived production tricks (close-miked acoustic guitars, tightly stacked vocal harmonies, deliberately rustic textures) showed up in his work and spread from there.</p>
<p>By the time Pitchfork's Mark Richardson reviewed the 2012 Archive Collection reissue, the consensus had completely flipped. Richardson awarded <em>Ram</em> a 9.1, calling it a record whose &quot;supposed flaws now sound like its great achievements.&quot; The review explicitly framed <em>Ram</em> as the unacknowledged template for indie pop, naming a lineage from Brian Wilson through <em>Ram</em> to artists like Of Montreal and Animal Collective.</p>
<p>Rolling Stone, which had buried the album in 1971, ranked it number 450 on its 2023 list of the greatest albums of all time. The mid-list placement is itself a kind of admission: <em>Ram</em> was always there; the publication just didn't know how to hear it.</p>
<h2>The McCartney III connection</h2>
<p>There's a direct line from <em>Ram</em> to <em>McCartney III</em>, the 2020 lockdown album that closed Paul's solo trilogy. Both records were made under deliberately constrained circumstances. Both feature Paul playing most instruments himself, with family members contributing where appropriate. Both arrived without the weight of expectation that attended the records around them, and both used that absence of expectation to do something stranger than they would have been allowed to otherwise.</p>
<p>The trilogy that <em>McCartney III</em> completes is sometimes described as the trilogy of Paul's solo records, but that framing misses the point. <em>Ram</em> is just as essential to the lineage. Together, <em>McCartney</em>, <em>Ram</em>, <em>McCartney II</em>, and <em>McCartney III</em> form the backbone of a four-decade investigation into what one Beatle does when no one is watching.</p>
<p>The answer, on this evidence, is something pretty close to indie pop, decades before anyone had a name for it.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry><entry>
    <title>Inside Cold Cuts: the Paul McCartney album that was never released, four times</title>
    <link href="https://maccafan.net/news/2026/04/cold-cuts/"/>
    <updated>2026-04-29T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <id>https://maccafan.net/news/2026/04/cold-cuts/</id>
    <author>
      <name>Maccafan Editorial</name>
    </author>
    <summary>The story of Cold Cuts, the unreleased McCartney outtakes compilation attempted between 1974 and 1987, and how its songs eventually found official release decades later through the Paul McCartney Archive Collection.</summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Of all the unreleased projects in Paul McCartney's catalog, none has been attempted more times, abandoned more decisively, or leaked more thoroughly than <em>Cold Cuts</em>.</p>
<p>It is, in the technical sense, an outtakes compilation. Across roughly thirteen years and four serious attempts at completion, Paul tried to assemble an album from the leftovers of his post-Beatles work. The material spanned sessions from <em>Ram</em> in 1970 through <em>Back to the Egg</em> in 1978, with overdubs added at various points by three different lineups of Wings. Each version got further than the last. None was ever officially released.</p>
<p>What follows is the story of how an album gets made, partially unmade, remade, leaked, and then, decades later, partially released as bonus tracks across an entirely different reissue program.</p>
<h2>The original concept: 1974</h2>
<p>The idea began during Wings' Nashville sessions in July 1974. Paul wanted to clear his shelf. He had been recording prolifically since 1970, and a substantial number of finished tracks had never made any of the studio albums. The concept was a budget release, originally titled <em>Hot Hitz and Kold Kutz</em>, that would pair greatest hits on one disc with B-sides, outtakes, and previously unreleased material on the other. The &quot;kold kutz&quot; half would be the more interesting one for fans, the part of the project Paul actually cared about.</p>
<p>The album was scheduled for March 1975 release, ahead of Wings' <em>Venus and Mars</em> later that year. It never happened. Capitol Records didn't see the commercial value of an outtakes compilation, and the label declined to schedule it.</p>
<h2>The 1978 attempt</h2>
<p>Paul revisited the project in October 1978, presenting it to EMI/Capitol again as a hits-and-rarities double album. The label was again unconvinced, and the project was repackaged into the more conventional <em>Wings Greatest</em>, released in November of that year. The B-sides and outtakes disc, <em>Kold Kutz</em>, was once more shelved.</p>
<p>This is the version that surfaced in 1988 as the bootleg LP <em>Cold Cuts (Another Early Version)</em>, pressed in a limited run of 100 green-marbled copies on the Wilbur label.</p>
<h2>The 1980-81 version: Wings' final lineup</h2>
<p>In late 1979, Paul retitled the project simply <em>Cold Cuts</em> and began compiling new tracklists. In January 1981, the third and final Wings lineup, with guitarist Laurence Juber and drummer Steve Holley, recorded fresh overdubs on tracks including <em>A Love for You</em>, <em>Waterspout</em>, <em>My Carnival</em>, and <em>Same Time Next Year</em>. The plan was a mid-1981 release.</p>
<p>This version of <em>Cold Cuts</em> is the one most heavily documented in the bootleg lineage. It removed several of Linda McCartney's vocal features and Denny Laine's instrumentals from earlier compilations in favor of more commercial material. It was, by most accounts, the closest the project ever came to feeling like a real album.</p>
<p>Two things killed it. The first was John Lennon's murder in December 1980, which made the timing of any McCartney outtakes album feel inappropriate. The second was Wings' own dissolution in early 1981. By the time the dust settled, Paul had moved on to <em>Tug of War</em>, his Beatle-aware reckoning album with George Martin, and <em>Cold Cuts</em> was once again on the shelf.</p>
<h2>The 1987 version</h2>
<p>The final attempt came in August 1987. Paul mixed and edited a new version of the album with producer Chris Thomas and engineer Bill Price, with additional work on <em>Mama's Little Girl</em> and <em>Same Time Next Year</em>. According to Paul himself, this version was to feature album art by the celebrated <em>New Yorker</em> illustrator Saul Steinberg, whom Paul had asked years earlier for a cover.</p>
<p>It didn't ship. Paul's then-manager Richard Ogden recommended that, given where Paul was in his career, a best-of compilation would serve him better. The result was <em>All the Best!</em>, released in November 1987. The previously unreleased <em>Waterspout</em> had been planned for that compilation but was pulled at the last minute. <em>Cold Cuts</em>, in any form, was finally and permanently abandoned.</p>
<p>The blow to the project was bootlegging itself. As Paul told Mark Lewisohn in <em>Club Sandwich</em> in 1994: &quot;It became a bootleg, which put me off the idea.&quot; Multiple unofficial pressings had appeared between 1987 and the early 1990s, each compiling a slightly different mixture of takes. The album existed in the world before it could be officially released.</p>
<h2>What was on it</h2>
<p>There was no single canonical <em>Cold Cuts</em> tracklist. Each version included different songs. But across the four attempts, the recurring tracks were:</p>
<ul>
<li><em><strong>A Love for You</strong></em> — Recorded during the <em>Ram</em> sessions in October 1970, with overdubs added by the third Wings lineup in 1981. The 1981 version is notable for being the only McCartney recording featuring members of both the first and final Wings lineups.</li>
<li><em><strong>My Carnival</strong></em> — Recorded during the <em>Venus and Mars</em> New Orleans sessions in early 1975.</li>
<li><em><strong>Waterspout</strong></em> — A <em>London Town</em> outtake recorded in Scotland in 1977, with horn overdubs added in 1987 for the planned <em>All the Best!</em> inclusion.</li>
<li><em><strong>Mama's Little Girl</strong></em> — From the <em>Red Rose Speedway</em> sessions in March 1972.</li>
<li><em><strong>Hey Diddle</strong></em> — A <em>Ram</em> session duet between Paul and Linda, with later Nashville overdubs.</li>
<li><em><strong>Tragedy</strong></em> — A Wings cover of the Fleetwoods' 1961 ballad, recorded during the <em>Red Rose Speedway</em> sessions.</li>
<li><em><strong>Same Time Next Year</strong></em> — Written for the 1978 Robert Mulligan film starring Alan Alda and Ellen Burstyn but rejected for the soundtrack.</li>
<li><em><strong>Cage</strong></em> — A <em>Back to the Egg</em> outtake from the Lympne Castle sessions in summer 1978.</li>
<li><em><strong>Did We Meet Somewhere Before?</strong></em> — Written as the proposed theme for the 1978 film <em>Heaven Can Wait</em>. Rejected. A snippet later appeared at the start of the Ramones' <em>Rock 'n' Roll High School</em> film.</li>
<li><em><strong>Best Friend</strong></em> — A live recording from Wings' August 1972 European tour, captured in Antwerp.</li>
</ul>
<h2>The afterlife: Archive Collection</h2>
<p>The strange epilogue to <em>Cold Cuts</em> is that nearly all of its tracks have, eventually, been officially released. Just not as a <em>Cold Cuts</em> album.</p>
<p>Beginning with the 2010 launch of the Paul McCartney Archive Collection, the deluxe reissue program that has progressively unboxed his back catalog, <em>Cold Cuts</em> material has been released as bonus tracks on the appropriate parent albums:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>A Love for You</em>: 2003 <em>The In-Laws</em> film soundtrack and 2012 <em>Ram</em> Archive Collection</li>
<li><em>Hey Diddle</em> (1971 mix): 2012 <em>Ram</em> Archive Collection</li>
<li><em>Hey Diddle</em> (Nashville mix): 2014 <em>Venus and Mars</em> Archive Collection</li>
<li><em>My Carnival</em>: 1985 <em>Spies Like Us</em> B-side, 2014 <em>Venus and Mars</em> reissue</li>
<li><em>Mama's Little Girl</em>: 1990 <em>Put It There</em> B-side, 2018 <em>Red Rose Speedway</em> reissue</li>
<li><em>Tragedy</em>: 2018 <em>Red Rose Speedway</em> Archive Collection</li>
<li><em>Best Friend</em>: 2018 <em>Red Rose Speedway</em> and <em>Wings Over Europe</em> reissues</li>
<li><em>Waterspout</em>: Still officially unreleased</li>
</ul>
<p>The result is a ghost album. Almost every song that would have been on <em>Cold Cuts</em> now exists, in officially-released form, scattered across the deluxe boxes of the records they were originally outtakes from. Listened to in sequence, they make a coherent mid-period McCartney album that is genuinely different from anything he released between 1971 and 1987.</p>
<p>What they don't make is <em>Cold Cuts</em>. The album as Paul conceived it, with its Saul Steinberg cover and its specific track sequencing decisions, will probably never exist. The closest a fan can come is the 1981 bootleg, which is itself preserved across multiple pressings, none authoritative.</p>
<p>In a 1994 interview, Paul mentioned the unused Steinberg cover art as &quot;probably the most compelling reason to issue the album, actually: just to use his cover.&quot; Steinberg died in 1999. The cover, if it still exists in MPL Communications' files, has yet to be published.</p>
<p>For now, <em>Cold Cuts</em> remains what it has been since 1975: an album that almost was, multiple times, in slightly different forms each time. The most thoroughly attempted Paul McCartney album that no Paul McCartney listener has ever officially heard.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry><entry>
    <title>Now and Then, two years later: how AI-assisted restoration brought a Lennon demo to a Grammy</title>
    <link href="https://maccafan.net/news/2026/04/now-and-then-two-years-later/"/>
    <updated>2026-04-26T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <id>https://maccafan.net/news/2026/04/now-and-then-two-years-later/</id>
    <author>
      <name>Maccafan Editorial</name>
    </author>
    <summary>Now and Then was released as the last Beatles song in November 2023 and won Best Rock Performance at the 2025 Grammys. A retrospective on its 45-year journey from John Lennon&#39;s home demo to a Beatles single.</summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>When <em>Now and Then</em> was released on November 2, 2023, it was the first new Beatles song to reach the public in twenty-seven years. It went to number one in the UK on November 10, the day of its physical single release. It was nominated for Record of the Year at the 67th Grammy Awards. It won Best Rock Performance at that same ceremony in February 2025, beating The Black Keys, Green Day, Idles, Pearl Jam, and St. Vincent. Sean Ono Lennon accepted the trophy on behalf of his father's group.</p>
<p>It was, in technical terms, a recording. Whether it was a Beatles recording is a question that depends on how the listener feels about the technology used to make it.</p>
<h2>The 1977 demo</h2>
<p>John Lennon recorded <em>Now and Then</em> at his apartment in the Dakota in New York, around 1977 or 1978. The original is a piano-and-vocal home demo, captured on a domestic cassette recorder. Lennon's voice and the piano are on the same track, which is the technical detail that would define the song's afterlife.</p>
<p>After Lennon's murder in December 1980, the demo sat in Yoko Ono's archive. In 1994, she gave it to the surviving Beatles, along with the demos that became <em>Free as a Bird</em> and <em>Real Love</em> on the <em>Anthology</em> project. Of the three demos, <em>Free as a Bird</em> and <em>Real Love</em> were completed and released as new Beatles singles in 1995 and 1996. <em>Now and Then</em> was attempted, briefly, in March 1995, then shelved.</p>
<p>The reason was technical. In 1995, audio source separation, the ability to isolate one instrument or voice from a mixed recording, was not a viable technology. The Lennon demo had vocals and piano on the same cassette track, with a hum from a refrigerator or some similar appliance audible in the background. Producer Jeff Lynne, who oversaw <em>Free as a Bird</em> and <em>Real Love</em>, could not separate Lennon's vocal from the piano cleanly enough to build a Beatles arrangement around it. The other surviving members had reservations of their own. George Harrison, in particular, was reportedly unconvinced that the song was strong enough to justify the technical effort. Paul McCartney told <em>Q</em> magazine in 1997 that &quot;George didn't like it. The Beatles being a democracy, we didn't do it.&quot;</p>
<p>The song was abandoned for nearly three decades.</p>
<h2>Get Back, and the technology</h2>
<p>The technology that made <em>Now and Then</em> possible came from an unexpected source: Peter Jackson's 2021 documentary series <em>The Beatles: Get Back</em>. Working with the original 1969 <em>Let It Be</em> sessions footage, Jackson's team developed a machine-learning audio separation tool that could isolate individual voices and instruments from mixed recordings. The technology was originally built to clean up dialogue from the <em>Get Back</em> footage.</p>
<p>Paul McCartney saw the potential immediately. In a June 2023 interview with BBC Radio 4's <em>Today</em> program, he disclosed that &quot;the last Beatles record&quot; had been completed using AI. The phrasing prompted alarm. Some listeners assumed AI had been used to synthesize Lennon's voice or generate new performance. McCartney clarified within days: &quot;Nothing has been artificially or synthetically created. It's all real and we all play on it. We cleaned up some existing recordings, a process which has gone on for years.&quot;</p>
<p>The distinction matters. AI was used as a separation tool, not a generation tool. Lennon's actual 1977 vocal performance, captured on the original cassette, was extracted from the piano track and the room noise. Nothing was added that was not already on the tape. What McCartney and Ringo Starr then did was build a new Beatles arrangement around the cleaned vocal, including overdubs and a string arrangement co-arranged by McCartney, Giles Martin, and Ben Foster.</p>
<p>Crucially, the recording also contains George Harrison. During the 1995 sessions, before the project was abandoned, Harrison had recorded acoustic and electric guitar parts. These were preserved in the <em>Anthology</em> archive and incorporated into the final 2023 mix. All four Beatles are on the track. It is the only Beatles recording to include all four members made after Lennon's death.</p>
<h2>The release</h2>
<p>The release rollout was unusually careful for a major-label single. A twelve-minute documentary directed by Oliver Murray was published on the Beatles' YouTube channel on November 1, 2023, the day before the song dropped. The film included session footage from both 1995 and the early 2020s, archival material, and interviews with McCartney, Starr, Sean Ono Lennon, and Peter Jackson.</p>
<p>The single itself appeared on streaming services on November 2 and as physical product the following day, paired with a new &quot;true stereo&quot; remix of the band's 1962 debut single <em>Love Me Do</em>. The two songs served as bookends to the band's recording history, the first single and the last, on a single double-A-side release. Vinyl pressings included white marble, light blue, clear, black 7-inch, red and black 12-inch editions, plus a cassette.</p>
<p>Ed Ruscha, the American artist who had designed the 2020 <em>McCartney III</em> cover, designed the <em>Now and Then</em> single sleeve. The back cover incorporated a photograph of a handmade folk-art clock that George Harrison had purchased in Providence, Rhode Island in 1997, with a Beatles photograph added to its face.</p>
<p>In the UK, the single went to number one on November 10, 2023, the same day as the release of the expanded <em>1967-1970</em> compilation that included it.</p>
<h2>The reception</h2>
<p>Critical response was largely positive but complicated. <em>Variety</em>'s Jem Aswad gave the song a qualified endorsement: &quot;<em>Now and Then</em> is not a lost Beatles classic. But to paraphrase McCartney's famous quote regarding criticism of <em>The White Album</em>, 'It's a bloody new Beatles song, shut up!'&quot;</p>
<p>The more substantive criticism came from listeners who felt that the song's nature as a posthumous collaboration changed its status. Russell Root, writing in <em>Salon</em>, argued that <em>Now and Then</em> was &quot;not a Beatles song, but rather a Beatles tribute song,&quot; and that the <em>Anthology</em>-era <em>Free as a Bird</em> and <em>Real Love</em> had stayed truer to both the original demos and the Beatles' sound. Mastering engineer Ian Shepherd noted that the stereo mix was heavily limited in dynamics, though the Dolby Atmos version did not suffer the same compression. Mastering engineer Miles Showell confirmed that the mix he received was indeed heavily compressed.</p>
<p>The AI question generated more debate than the music itself. Some commentators saw the song as a thoughtful and limited application of new technology. Others saw it as a precedent that opened the door to less careful uses of the same tools. The Grammy nomination, when it came in late 2024, intensified the debate. Was a song completed forty-five years after its composer's death, with the help of machine learning, eligible for an award meant to honor the year's best recordings?</p>
<p>The Recording Academy's answer was yes. <em>Now and Then</em> was nominated for Record of the Year, ultimately losing to Kendrick Lamar's <em>Not Like Us</em>, but won Best Rock Performance.</p>
<h2>What it actually sounds like</h2>
<p>For all the technological and ethical conversation around it, <em>Now and Then</em> is, at its core, a McCartney-shaped Lennon song. The melody is unmistakably Lennon, with the falling phrase structure and the deliberate rhyme schemes (&quot;I know it's true / it's all because of you&quot;) that defined his late-period writing. The arrangement, with its strings, its tasteful acoustic guitars, and its carefully managed dynamics, is unmistakably McCartney.</p>
<p>The most affecting moment in the song is structural. The arrangement holds back during Lennon's verses, letting the cleaned vocal sit in the foreground with minimal accompaniment. When the strings enter, it feels both like a tribute to the orchestral arrangements George Martin built for <em>Eleanor Rigby</em> and <em>A Day in the Life</em> and like an admission that there are some things only McCartney would do to a Lennon vocal.</p>
<p>Ringo Starr's drums, recorded in the early 2020s, are the third Beatle voice on the song, distinctive for their characteristically loose feel. George Harrison's 1995 guitar parts thread through the second half. The result is, structurally, what it claims to be: all four Beatles, on a single recording, decades after such a thing should have been possible.</p>
<h2>What comes next</h2>
<p>In November 2025, the <em>Now and Then</em> mini-documentary was released as part of the song's two-year anniversary celebrations. Paul McCartney performed <em>Now and Then</em> live for the first time during his 2025 Got Back tour. The song's status, as something between a <em>Beatles</em> recording and a McCartney-produced tribute to the band's history, has settled into the catalog.</p>
<p>The technology that made it possible has, predictably, been applied elsewhere. Peter Jackson's separation tool has been used on additional Beatles archive material. The Lennon estate has signaled that other unfinished demos may be candidates for similar treatment, though no further releases have been announced. The conversation about what AI assistance means in legacy artist contexts has, if anything, only intensified.</p>
<p>What <em>Now and Then</em> established, more clearly than the debate around it acknowledges, is that the question is no longer whether such recordings are possible. They are. The question is whether they should exist, what their relationship is to the original creative act, and how they should be received. <em>Now and Then</em> is the recording that forced those questions into the open. The answers are still being worked out.</p>
<p>For Maccafan readers specifically, the song also functioned as a quiet announcement that the Beatles archive is still capable of surprises. The 1995 Harrison guitar parts, sitting in storage for nearly three decades, were not the last unreleased Beatles material in the vault. What else might emerge, on what timeline, with what technology, is no longer a hypothetical. It is a planning question.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry><entry>
    <title>A guide to Paul McCartney&#39;s eighteen solo studio albums</title>
    <link href="https://maccafan.net/news/2026/04/solo-albums-guide/"/>
    <updated>2026-04-22T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
    <id>https://maccafan.net/news/2026/04/solo-albums-guide/</id>
    <author>
      <name>Maccafan Editorial</name>
    </author>
    <summary>A complete guide to Paul McCartney&#39;s solo studio albums, from McCartney in 1970 through McCartney III in 2020. Eighteen records spanning fifty years of post-Beatles work.</summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>For a new listener approaching Paul McCartney's solo catalog, the first challenge is its size. Eighteen studio albums released between 1970 and 2020. Add Wings (seven studio albums), classical projects (five), the Fireman (three), and various compilations and live releases, and the total reaches well over forty records.</p>
<p>This guide is for the listener who wants to understand the solo catalog specifically: the eighteen albums Paul released under his own name. Wings is treated separately, as is the orchestral and Fireman work. The intent is not to rank them but to place each one in its context, so a new listener can find an entry point that fits their interests.</p>
<h2>The DIY trilogy</h2>
<p>These three albums share a common method: Paul plays nearly every instrument, often alone in a home studio, with minimal outside collaboration.</p>
<h3>McCartney (1970)</h3>
<p>Recorded mostly at home on a four-track during late 1969 and early 1970, this album was released two weeks before the <em>Let It Be</em> film and effectively confirmed the Beatles' end. <em>Maybe I'm Amazed</em> is its monument. The rest of the record is deliberately ramshackle, full of fragments and instrumentals. Critics dismissed it on release. It is now considered foundational for what would later be called bedroom pop.</p>
<h3>McCartney II (1980)</h3>
<p>Recorded at home in the summer of 1979 in the wake of Wings' Japan tour cancellation and Paul's brief Japanese imprisonment for cannabis possession, <em>McCartney II</em> is the most sonically experimental album in his catalog. <em>Coming Up</em>, <em>Temporary Secretary</em>, and <em>Waterfalls</em> push into early-eighties synth-pop territory before that sound was widely understood. The album was puzzling on release and has been substantially reassessed since.</p>
<h3>McCartney III (2020)</h3>
<p>Recorded at Hog Hill Mill in Sussex during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, <em>McCartney III</em> completes the trilogy. It is the most reflective of the three, with songs like <em>Pretty Boys</em>, <em>Women and Wives</em>, and <em>Long Tailed Winter Bird</em> leaning into Paul's age rather than away from it. Critical response was warm, with Pitchfork awarding it a 7.1.</p>
<p><strong>Entry point:</strong> <em>McCartney II</em> if you like adventurous production. <em>McCartney III</em> if you want the most consistent songwriting.</p>
<h2>The Linda McCartney album</h2>
<h3>Ram (1971)</h3>
<p>The only album credited jointly to Paul and Linda. Recorded in New York with session musicians including future Wings drummer Denny Seiwell, <em>Ram</em> was savaged on release and has since been rehabilitated as one of the most influential records of its decade. <em>Uncle Albert/Admiral Halsey</em>, <em>Too Many People</em>, <em>The Back Seat of My Car</em>, and <em>Monkberry Moon Delight</em> are the standouts. The 2012 Archive Collection reissue is the recommended edition. (See our <a href="/news/2026/05/ram-retrospective/">full Ram retrospective</a> for the complete story.)</p>
<p><strong>Entry point:</strong> Start here if you like compositional ambition and unusual texture.</p>
<h2>The post-Wings 1980s</h2>
<p>Wings dissolved in early 1981. The four albums that followed represent Paul's most commercial period as a solo artist, with mainstream production and major collaborators. The 1980s catalog is the period most contested by critics; some hear it as Paul at his most polished, others as Paul at his most diluted.</p>
<h3>Tug of War (1982)</h3>
<p>Produced by George Martin in his first full McCartney production since the Beatles. Features <em>Ebony and Ivory</em> (with Stevie Wonder) and <em>Here Today</em>, Paul's elegy for John Lennon. Often cited as Paul's strongest 1980s album.</p>
<h3>Pipes of Peace (1983)</h3>
<p>A direct sequel to <em>Tug of War</em>, sharing producer, sessions, and several musicians. Includes <em>Say Say Say</em> with Michael Jackson. Less consistent than its predecessor.</p>
<h3>Give My Regards to Broad Street (1984)</h3>
<p>The soundtrack to Paul's box-office-failing film of the same name. Mixes new material with re-recorded Beatles songs. Considered a low point at the time, partially reassessed since.</p>
<h3>Press to Play (1986)</h3>
<p>A deliberate stylistic reset, produced by Hugh Padgham. Features collaborations with Eric Stewart of 10cc. Commercial disappointment on release; modest cult status now.</p>
<p><strong>Entry point:</strong> <em>Tug of War</em> if you want the best of the period.</p>
<h2>The Russian curiosity</h2>
<h3>Снова в СССР / Choba B CCCP (1988 / 1991)</h3>
<p>An album of rock and roll covers recorded in two days in 1987, released only in the Soviet Union in 1988 in a deliberate gesture toward Soviet listeners who had been unable to legally purchase Western music. Released worldwide in 1991. Not a major artistic statement but a fascinating historical artifact. Maccafan covers the album in depth in our <a href="/Albums/">archive section</a>.</p>
<h2>The late-eighties and nineties</h2>
<h3>Flowers in the Dirt (1989)</h3>
<p>Produced with Mitchell Froom and others, with co-writes by Elvis Costello. The Costello collaborations (<em>My Brave Face</em>, <em>You Want Her Too</em>, <em>Don't Be Careless Love</em>) are the album's high points. A genuine return to form after the 1980s commercial wobble.</p>
<h3>Off the Ground (1993)</h3>
<p>Recorded with the touring band Paul had assembled for the <em>New World Tour</em>. Less essential than <em>Flowers in the Dirt</em> but contains the underrated <em>Hope of Deliverance</em> and <em>Off the Ground</em>.</p>
<h3>Flaming Pie (1997)</h3>
<p>Produced by Jeff Lynne and George Martin during the <em>Anthology</em> period, with Ringo Starr on drums on three tracks. Paul has called it the album he made because <em>Anthology</em> reminded him of the standards he wanted to reach. <em>The Song We Were Singing</em> and <em>Calico Skies</em> are particular highlights. Widely considered his best album of the 1990s.</p>
<p><strong>Entry point:</strong> <em>Flaming Pie</em>. If you want one Paul album from the 1990s, this is it.</p>
<h2>The 2000s renaissance</h2>
<h3>Run Devil Run (1999)</h3>
<p>A rock and roll covers album, recorded in a week with David Gilmour and Mick Green, made in the wake of Linda's death from breast cancer. Cathartic and unexpectedly raw.</p>
<h3>Driving Rain (2001)</h3>
<p>The first album of original material after Linda's death. Recorded in California with producer David Kahne. Includes the only Beatle-on-Beatle collaboration with George Harrison after the <em>Anthology</em> sessions, on <em>Vanilla Sky</em>.</p>
<h3>Chaos and Creation in the Backyard (2005)</h3>
<p>Produced by Nigel Godrich (Radiohead, Beck), who pushed Paul to play most instruments himself in a deliberate echo of <em>McCartney</em> and <em>McCartney II</em>. The result is the strongest review-driven album of Paul's solo career, nominated for Album of the Year at the 2006 Grammys.</p>
<h3>Memory Almost Full (2007)</h3>
<p>A lighter follow-up to <em>Chaos</em>, also self-played in significant portions. Includes <em>Dance Tonight</em> and <em>Mr. Bellamy</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Entry point:</strong> <em>Chaos and Creation in the Backyard</em>. If you want one Paul album from the 2000s, this is it.</p>
<h2>The 2010s</h2>
<h3>Kisses on the Bottom (2012)</h3>
<p>A standards album of pre-rock-era covers, with a Diana Krall band. Often overlooked but quietly excellent for what it is.</p>
<h3>New (2013)</h3>
<p>Produced by Mark Ronson, Ethan Johns, Paul Epworth, and Giles Martin, with each producer handling a few tracks. The youngest-sounding album Paul has made since the 1980s. <em>Save Us</em>, <em>New</em>, and <em>Queenie Eye</em> are the singles.</p>
<h3>Egypt Station (2018)</h3>
<p>Produced by Greg Kurstin (Adele, Kelly Clarkson) and Ryan Tedder (OneRepublic). His first US number-one solo album since 1982's <em>Tug of War</em>. <em>I Don't Know</em> and <em>Confidante</em> are the standouts.</p>
<p><strong>Entry point:</strong> <em>Egypt Station</em>. The most consistent late-period Paul album before the <em>McCartney III</em> trilogy capper.</p>
<h2>Recommended listening order for new listeners</h2>
<p>If you have never seriously engaged with Paul's solo catalog, a five-album introduction would be:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Ram (1971)</strong> — The compositional and textural blueprint</li>
<li><strong>Flaming Pie (1997)</strong> — The post-Anthology craftsmanship benchmark</li>
<li><strong>Chaos and Creation in the Backyard (2005)</strong> — The most critically acclaimed late-period album</li>
<li><strong>McCartney II (1980)</strong> — The most experimental work</li>
<li><strong>McCartney III (2020)</strong> — The trilogy capstone and the late style</li>
</ol>
<p>These five records, listened to in sequence, will give a new listener a working sense of Paul's solo career: its variety, its evolution, its preoccupations, and its persistent strangeness. From that base, any of the other thirteen studio albums become more navigable.</p>
<p>The Wings catalog, the classical work, and the Fireman albums are separate guides. We will publish each in due course.</p>
<p>For a deeper dive into individual albums, our <a href="/Albums/">Albums archive</a> contains track-by-track notes and recording histories for the entire catalog, written by Pierre Rattaire and contributors over the past twenty-five years.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry></feed>
